For those who've got the November issue of Practical Classics, have you spotted the letter on page 31? For those who haven't got the mag, the short letter ends up with:
"Sadly, I am unable to give you permission to publish the photographs I sent you as, since my husband passed away, I no longer know who owns them and would not wish to run foul of privacy laws. Sincerely"
OK, all very serious, but it's from Lady Agatha Maberley, Bowal, New South Wales, Australia - not the most common of names.
However, if you read the first paragraph in isolation, it all reads very differently. The Lady starts:
"I am most impressed you showed an interest in my Bristols (Letters October). My late husband used to love messing about with them" :shock:
So, either she's made s a very unfortunate choice of words or else it's a total wind up. If you're reading this Lady Agatha, I apologise
Cheers
Julian
"Sadly, I am unable to give you permission to publish the photographs I sent you as, since my husband passed away, I no longer know who owns them and would not wish to run foul of privacy laws. Sincerely"
OK, all very serious, but it's from Lady Agatha Maberley, Bowal, New South Wales, Australia - not the most common of names.
However, if you read the first paragraph in isolation, it all reads very differently. The Lady starts:
"I am most impressed you showed an interest in my Bristols (Letters October). My late husband used to love messing about with them" :shock:
So, either she's made s a very unfortunate choice of words or else it's a total wind up. If you're reading this Lady Agatha, I apologise

Cheers
Julian
Comment