A big win for the little people

[Paul Roberts]

Following a lot of hassle, threats and intimidation from this bunch of f*****g crooks (as the registered owner of the vehicle it fell upon me to pay) I can confirm a satisfying victory for the ordinary law abiding citizen.

This "ticket" was picked up, by swmbo awaiting my imminent arrival, as we set off on our 30th wedding anniversary.

Should anyone have need of my appeal narative (it can be easily adapted to suit individual arguments) feel free to ask and I'll email it.

These shysters must be challenged and beaten in my opinion.

PARKING ON PRIVATE LAND APPEALS
PO Box 70748 London EC1P 1SN
0845 207 7700
enquiries@popla.org.uk

https://www.popla.org.uk

Parking on Private Land Appeals is administered by the Transport and Environment Committee of London Councils
Calls to Parking on Private Land Appeals may be recorded

22 May 2014
Reference 6060934026
always quote in any communication with POPLA

Paul Roberts (Appellant)-v-ParkingEye Ltd (Operator)

The Operator issued parking charge notice number 471142/070934 arising out of a presence on private land, of a vehicle with registration mark V239MDL.
The Appellant appealed against liability for the parking charge.
The Assessor has considered the evidence of both parties and has determined that the appeal be allowed.
The Assessor’s reasons are as set out.
The Operator should now cancel the parking charge notice forthwith.

2 22 May 2014
Reasons for the Assessor’s Determination
It is the Appellant’s case that the parking charge notice was issued incorrectly.
The Operator has not produced a copy of the parking charge notice, nor any evidence to show a breach of the conditions of parking occurred, nor any evidence that shows what the conditions of parking, in fact, were.
Accordingly I have no option but to allow the appeal.
Shehla Pirwany
Assessor

Power to the pygmys

TBO

[Rubce]

Well done.

When we received one a few years ago we just ignored them and they eventually went away although I think the law has changed since then

Regards

[mike@thenook]

Well done Paul,

Very useful piece of knowledge which hopefully, I will never need.

I had an argument with the local lot recently over the fact my car had it's wheels 4 inches outside a designated parking space, primarily because the selfish bast*rd in the other end of the space had used up a lot more than he needed - I lost!

[malc4d]

ditto, had to sqeezzzzzze the car into the space when l parked. On my return l saw the dreaded ticket issued for improper parking........
In the meantime all the other cars had gone and mine was parked across two bays. Needless to say, l had to pay

[Paul Roberts]

Swmbo had one of those too, a couple of years ago.

I beat that one by parking my brother's Volvo and trailer in one bay (that over filled the bay entire as the trailer wheels were on the line) his two motorbikes in the middle of the two bays in front of him, (that rendered the bays completely occupied) his wife's Volvo Estate in the next-but-one bay behind him and two Smart City's in the bay between the Volvos.

I pointed out the utter madness of the box system in a busy high street parking block and asked if the bikers would be booked for being utterly selfish. I asked if the trailer rig driver could be done (only the wheels have to be inside the box) and which of the two Smart drivers they would prosecute....

They struggled with all of that and reverted to type: rules is rules.... .

The appeal judge upheld my argument. Bless 'im ....

They're all just crooks disguised as civil servants.

TBO

[gripper180]

get on "the consumer forum" you dont pay for ANY ticket on private land.
regards bob.