If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Registration to this Forum is open to Members of The Stag Owners Club (SOC) and Affiliated Overseas Clubs. Non members with an interest in the Triumph Stag may avail of a 30 day trial membership of the Forum. Details in the FAQ section. Registration is not necessary if you just wish to view the forums. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
When I rebuilt my Stag 4 years ago I re-fitted the original rear springs. It is now sitting higher at the back than the front but the only thing different is new dampers and bushes etc. And spring seats. The new spring seats are now poly and my theory is that they are much harder than the old rubber ones so they don't deform so much. The spring is (roughly) half way along the swing arm so a half inch increase in height at the spring would produce a 1 inch increase at the wheel.
One of these days I intend to refit the old rubber spring seats to test the theory!
Cheers,
Mike.
When I rebuilt my TR last Winter I replaced the perished rubber spring insulators with poly items and it has lifted the rear end by about 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch with nothing else changed, so they do make quite a difference.
Neil
Neil
TV8, efi, fast road cams and home built manifolds. 246bhp 220lbft torque
I went for paddocks inch lower springs, new rubber spring pads, std dampers & std wheels with 195/70 tyres
Some think it looks too low.
The spring pads sent were different shore harnesses by a country mile.
Got a matching set eventually.
Noticed they are looking more perished than the originals, only 18mths after fitting.
Maybe poly spring pads would be the better choice?
Comment