Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Emisions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Emisions

    Hi all, car passed MOT today with no issues. Got the emissions checked although its not a requirement on a 74. I know its running a bit lean. Could somebody interpret these figure please and is it worth adjusting the mixture?

    CO 1.76
    COcor 1.99
    CO2 11.5
    Lambda 1.129
    HC 175
    O2 3.73

    Cheers Mark

    #2
    Mine the other day for example was CO 5. HC 450. Apparently you are allowed HC up to 1200. The MOT tester said that the old cars do smell as if they are running a bit rich, as they have no catalytic converters. Tim

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Tim Ward View Post
      Mine the other day for example was CO 5. HC 450. Apparently you are allowed HC up to 1200. The MOT tester said that the old cars do smell as if they are running a bit rich, as they have no catalytic converters. Tim
      Hi tim, I'll assume that low is good then?

      Comment


        #4
        My thoughts are your CO is too low. I think the book figures when new was around 2.5 to 3. that was before wear in the jets had taken place. I am sure somebody else will have some thoughts on it as well.

        Comment


          #5
          [QUOTE=Tim Ward;380155]My thoughts are your CO is too low. I think the book figures when new was around 2.5 to 3. that was before wear in the jets had taken place. I am sure somebody else will have some thoughts on it as well.

          Do you know what that means?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Tim Ward View Post
            My thoughts are your CO is too low. I think the book figures when new was around 2.5 to 3. that was before wear in the jets had taken place. I am sure somebody else will have some thoughts on it as well.
            Dont really understand it. Would be great if somebody could explain what it all means and what needs to be done.

            Comment


              #7
              you need to adjust the carbs with a tool to make the CO a bit higher. Might be worth taking it to a garage that specialises in classic cars

              Comment


                #8
                Have you the original carbs?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by KOY 23 View Post
                  Have you the original carbs?
                  They are strombergs, I doubt they are the original to the car tho. Are these figures suggesting that it is just running a bit weak? Thanks Mark

                  Comment


                    #10
                    1.129 lambda is about 16.5:1 AFR , idle is usually set a tad rich something like 13.5:1 to 14:1 , so yours looks to be quite lean if that figure is correct.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Stagdad View Post
                      1.129 lambda is about 16.5:1 AFR , idle is usually set a tad rich something like 13.5:1 to 14:1 , so yours looks to be quite lean if that figure is correct.
                      Thank you stagdad, thats what I needed to know. Would you say a 1/4 turn richer on each carb would suffice or 1/2 turn? Thanks again Mark

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Do you know what your current fuel consumption is?

                        It is definitely too lean, so give them quarter of a turn each. Fuel consumption should not suffer until you get too rich, and you might notice better throttle response.

                        If you don't know what your current fuel consumption is, then you are really shooting in the dark.

                        Don't assume that just because it is correct at idle, that it is correct anywhere else due to carburettor wear. There have been a few posting on here that they have to wind the mixture weak for the MOT then put it back to improve driveability, though it can work the other way as well.

                        If quarter of a turn improves things you could then try a bit more and again keep an eye on the fuel consumption.

                        Neil
                        Neil
                        TV8, efi, fast road cams and home built manifolds. 246bhp 220lbft torque

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by flying farmer View Post
                          Do you know what your current fuel consumption is?

                          It is definitely too lean, so give them quarter of a turn each. Fuel consumption should not suffer until you get too rich, and you might notice better throttle response.

                          If you don't know what your current fuel consumption is, then you are really shooting in the dark.

                          Don't assume that just because it is correct at idle, that it is correct anywhere else due to carburettor wear. There have been a few posting on here that they have to wind the mixture weak for the MOT then put it back to improve driveability, though it can work the other way as well.

                          If quarter of a turn improves things you could then try a bit more and again keep an eye on the fuel consumption.

                          Neil
                          Hi Neil, thanks for the reply. To be honest, Ive never been one for checking fuel consumption. I just put fuel in when its required. I will give it a 1/4 turn and then keep an eye on the colour of the plugs. Thanks again. Mark

                          Comment


                            #14
                            You won't be able to tell much from the colour of the plugs as unleaded does not give anywhere near the same plug colours as old leaded. Just a rough guide these days.
                            Header tanks - you can't beat a bit of bling.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              The Stag engine is perfectly capable of running nice and lean, thanks to the wedge head design.
                              Just because a car doesn't have a catalytic convertor doesn't mean it's creating loads of pollution.

                              An HC figure of only 175 is really exemplary for a 30 yr old car.
                              If the car shows no signs of missing cylinders and gives good torque, leave well alone.

                              Comment

                              canli bahis siteleri bahis siteleri ecebet.net
                              Chad fucks Amara Romanis ass on his top ?????????????? ???? ?????? ?????? ? ??????? fotos de hombres mostrando el pene
                              güvenilir bahis siteleri
                              Working...
                              X