Originally posted by edd
View Post
I am not sure I understand the difference in impact between a CWP ;-) running dry and a EWP belt breaking. Surely the end result in both cases is coolant stops circulating and engine will overheat.
re your acquaintance, I would much rather keep my eyes on the road hence low level warning light in place of seatbelt warning light

My dad experienced a cooling hose failure in his saab 9000 (alf a stag engine init) and that overheated and caused head damage in the time it took to get from lane 3 to the hardshoulder. he had a coolant level warning light on the dash. so that failure was measured in seconds.
My old range rover 3.9 popped it's cooling system on the m40 due to slipped liner issues, unfortunately i was stuck in lane 4 and access to hard shoulder was blocked by traffic queuing to get into the m25. I had to drive just over a mile and by the time I stopped the engine had seized solid. although it did start again after an hour of cooling the thing was a total loss.
that said I do like the idea of the ewp rather than the more expensive eewp And modern belts make a heck of a racket hours before they eventually fail. not sure I have heard of one snapping since I was a nipper. So i guess that your faith in EWP setup is justified.
My low level warning light and modified high level expansion tank setup means that I can keep my CWP for the time being

Comment